Any of the following, however, would have been more accurate:
DeLay apologizes for inflammatory language; still advocates undermining judiciary
DeLay apologizes for tone of previous statement without changing position
DeLay apologizes for rhetoric appearing to threaten judges with violence; continues to threaten their jobs
DeLay backed into a corner; whimpers, then attacks
DeLay babbles incoherent non-apology; still a total douchebag
DeLay did express regret for saying, after the death of Schiavo, that the judges who refused to reinsert the brain-damaged woman's feeding tube would one day "answer for their behavior."So, in fact, DeLay was making an apology for the actual words he used, not for the underlying rhetoric—not for the Right’s continued attack on the judiciary.
[…]
"I said something in an inartful way. I am sorry I said it that way," DeLay said.
He said he favors an independent judiciary but made it plain that he does not intend to give up congressional efforts to rein in "activist" judges.
"We've got jurisdiction over the courts. We set up the courts, and we can unset the courts," DeLay said. "We have the power of the purse."
And, regardless of the nature of his apology, isn’t the bigger (by a fucking long shot) issue in this story that the House Majority Leader continues to espouse the idea that the courts are meant to act at the behest of the legislature?
DeLay leads charge to permanently undermine system of checks and balances; electorate waves goodbye to democracy
How’s that for a headline?
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus