But it turns out she belongs to Quentin Tarantino and wasn't worth shit until he "found" her.
Text: "The Call Back: That bad-boy auteur Quentin Tarantino auditions his newest find, Diane Kruger."
This image is even more unsettling, for a variety of reasons.
Weirdly, nothing in Tarantino's interview is remotely related to this framing. As per usual, he talks about himself more than anything else; the only passing mention of Kruger is in a question he's asked. And in an interview with Kruger, linked from the piece, she notes that she had to beg for an audition with Tarantino, who didn't originally want to see her because he didn't believe she was really German, and then had to fly to Berlin for an audition after he was unable to work with his first-choice actress.
In other words, he didn't "find" her at all, but her persistence and tenacity and hard work (she memorized 30 pages in German and English for the audition) paid off.
So the framing is wholly a construction of the Times' evident inability to talk about a man and a woman in a professional relationship without turning her into his property. Nice.
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus