51 Vote Rules May Force a Public Option Too Liberal for Some Dems:
As Senate leaders begin work on a Democrat-only health care bill, they're finding themselves confronted with an unexpected irony: Though the caucus has reached an uneasy consensus around a public option that's modeled in many ways after a private insurer, it may be necessary to make the public option more liberal, and thus, more politically radioactive, if it's to overcome a number of unique procedural hurdles.Other recommended reading:
This is the needle Democrats may have to thread if they want a public option, and at the same time, want to bypass a Republican filibuster. And the key for them will be keeping conservative Democrats on board.
GOP readies wave of objections to stall healthcare bill in Senate: "Sen. Judd Gregg has hundreds of procedural objections ready for a healthcare plan Democrats want to speed through the Senate. Gregg (N.H.), the senior Republican on the Budget Committee, told The Hill in a recent interview that Republicans will wage a vicious fight if Democrats try to circumvent Senate rules and use a budget maneuver to pass a trillion-dollar healthcare plan with a simple majority."
(That's the guy Obama wanted to be in his cabinet! Wheeeeeeeeeeee!)
WaPo/Norm Ornstein: Obama's Health-Care Realism
WaPo/Ezra Klein: Has Obama Played Health Care Exactly Right? Does It Even Matter?
CBS: Poll: Two-Thirds Confused by Health Reform
Steve Benen: The "Goverment-Is-Bad Paradigm" Lingers
Discuss.
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus