There are, however, some charities that you might want to avoid. Yes, Virginia, there are scams out there who have all the ethics of a Nigerian e-mailer. And there are also groups who have a reputation for putting on a face of charity and giving yet have no problem with discrimination against people they don't like. Case in point: the Salvation Army.
Scripture opposes homosexual practices by direct comment and also by clearly implied disapproval. The Bible treats such practices as self-evidently abnormal. ...Well, if being gay -- "genitally expressed" or not -- makes me ineligible to ring the bell over the little red kettle, than I am sure they don't want my money, either, so I won't give them the moral dilemma of taking it from someone who is "self-evidently abnormal." As a Quaker, it would be very un-Friendly of me to force them to accept it, so I won't put them through the struggle. That's my little gift to them.
[S]ame-sex relationships which are genitally expressed are unacceptable according to the teaching of Scripture. Attempts to establish or promote such relationships as viable alternatives to heterosexually-based family life do not conform to God's will for society. ...
[S]uch practices, if unrenounced, render a person ineligible for Salvation Army soldiership, in the same way that unrenounced heterosexual misconduct is a bar to soldiership.
HT to Lurleen at Pam's House.
Crossposted.
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus