The court, with evident amusement, said it must rule against [Manhattan lawyer Roy Den Hollander] even though "without action on our part, (he) paints a picture of a bleak future, where 'none other than what's left of the Wall Street moguls' will be able to afford to attend nightclubs."Good luck with all that, Roy.
…"The guys are paying for girls to party. I don't think that's fair," Den Hollander said. "It's a transfer of money fom the wallets of guys to the pocketbooks of girls."
He vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The best part of his complaint, however, is that he doesn't lay the responsibility for ladies' nights at the doorstep of the money-grubbing club promoters who use the promise of cheap booze to lure women into their meat markets for the benefit of their horny male clientele, but instead "blames militant feminists for the ladies-pay-less door policies." He's really onto us, my Feminazi Cooter Cultists.
Shaker Tereska, who gets the hat tip, exclaims: "Of course ladies' nights were fought for and won by feminists. My top two issues are access to abortion and HALF PRICED MARTINIS!!!"
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus