Minneapolis was also the city where I came out of the closet. Back in the 1970's it was a very active city for gay rights and it had a thriving LGBT community, and not just among us theatre folk. Even though this was years before the AIDS epidemic, there were LGBT organizations that looked out for the health and well-being of gay citizens. In 1976, it seemed like Minnesota was the example for the rest of the country to follow in equality.
So I don't know where Michele Bachmann (R-MN) and homophobic preachers like Bradlee Dean come from, and I don't know what would lead the Republican-led state legislature to come up with something like this:
After a long, passionate and solemn debate that lasted deep into the night, the Minnesota House passed a proposed constitutional amendment on Saturday to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.If certain other states where I've lived have set examples for bigoted politicians and in-the-pocket legislatures and held patents on intolerant preachers -- hello Colorado and Florida -- it's not that much of a surprise; there have always been sharp political divisions in those states and the scales tilt back and forth. (Florida, though, is taking its own sweet time to get back to normal.) But Minnesota... practical, pragmatic, fair, friendly -- there's something bonding about enjoying a quiet evening at home when it's -35F or sailing on Lake Minnetonka and battling the mosquitoes. So what was it that drove it off the rails?
Voters will decide the question in November 2012. The final vote was 70-62. Four Republicans voted no. Two Democrats voted yes.
"I do not believe it is up to judges or even this body, but it should be up to Minnesotans," said Rep. Steve Gottwalt, R-St. Cloud, sponsor of the bill. But he said his beliefs are not paramount: "It is not about what I think. It is about what we think as Minnesotans."
In personal, sometimes tearful speeches, opponents said the amendment is wrong.
"Members, I understand discrimination. I have experienced discrimination. And have felt discrimination," said Rep. John Ward, DFL-Brainerd, who often holds his microphone in a shrunken hand. "If you think there is a tiny bit of discrimination in this amendment, I beg you, I ask you, I implore you to vote no."
The amendment question will set off multimillion-dollar campaigns from both sides. It also is expected to draw in national donors, operatives and attention, as did campaigns in several dozen other states that have voted on the issue.
Minnesota law already bans gay marriage, but backers of the proposal say only a constitutional amendment could keep courts from deciding the issue. An amendment also works around DFL Gov. Mark Dayton, who said he opposes it with "every fiber" of his being. Governors have no veto over constitutional amendments passed by a legislative majority.
---
Footnote: One thing Minnesotans are famous for is their dry sense of humor -- maybe that's where I get mine. When Tim Pawlenty, the state's former governor, announced he was running for president yesterday, the St. Paul Pioneer Press ran the news on the obituary page.
Cross-posted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus