Hmmm, are there any other ways in which a democracy might assess the people's will? I can think of three — which we're all aware of but which are worth revisiting:—The Atlantic's James Fallows.
1) Just last year, a presidential election was fought over this exact issue, along with economic policy more broadly. When the votes came in, Barack Obama scored a runaway Electoral College win — and became the first person since Dwight Eisenhower to get more than 51% of the popular vote twice.
...[W]e very recently had the most formal test a democracy offers of a president's policies, rather than some set of push-polls, and Obama won in a walk.
2) In that year's elections for the Senate, the Democrats increased their majority by two seats and overall received 10 million+ more votes than all Republican candidates.
3) And last year even in the elections for the House, Democrats — who for better or worse were forced to run on Obamacare and the president's economic policies — gained 8 seats and received 1.7 million more votes than did all Republican candidates combined.
...[A]ll evidence suggests that without post-2010 gerrymandering, the Democrats might well control the House right now, along with the Senate and White House.
In short, we have a faction making historically unprecedented demands — give us everything, or we stop the government and potentially renege on the national debt. And it is doing so less than a year after its party lost the presidency, lost the Senate (and lost ground there), and held onto the House in part because of rotten-borough distortions.
You can call this a lot of things, but "gridlock" should not be one of them. And you can fault many aspects of the President's response — when it comes to debt-default, I think he has to stick to the "no negotiations with terrorists" hard line. But you shouldn't pretend that if he had been more "reasonable" or charming he could placate a group whose goal is the undoing of his time in office.
The fact is that in our gerrymandered, money-soaked, manipulated representative democracy, the smallest number of vote-getters are running the country. And claiming to be serving the will of the people.
Other recommended reading:
Reuters: A Million U.S. Government Workers, Unions Brace for Shutdown.
Think Progress: Federal Workers May Not Get Paid Even after the Shutdown Ends.
TPM: House of Turds.
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
—The Atlantic's blog comments powered by Disqus