Time stamp on this article: August 9, 2017. https://t.co/AY5nTEbJqp
— Sarah Lerner (@SarahLerner) August 10, 2017
Hahahahahahahahahahaomgkillme: "Justice Department lawyers representing State argued that making them search other employees' accounts for Clinton's emails would set a bad precedent that would belabor other FOIA searches. But [U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta] said the circumstances surrounding Clinton's email represented 'a specific fact pattern unlikely to arise in the future.'"
Like the pattern of women dedicating their lives to public service even though the cost is a living nightmare hellscape from which there is no escape? Is that the pattern unlikely to arise again in the future to which Judge Mehta is referring?
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus