DeVos was unable to answer even basic questions about public education, even in her home state of Michigan, where she has long been a "reformer," which means undermining the public education system in favor of privatization, including charter schools and vouchers. She is shamefully ignorant — something that was abundantly clear during her confirmation hearing.
But the job with which she's been tasked by the Trump administration isn't to be knowledgeable and competent; it's to peddle lies and destroy free public education for every child, thus subverting even more thoroughly what is meant to be a great equalizer among classes and races and genders and abilities, and inevitably reducing opportunities for less privileged children.
The interview and transcript are available [Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] at 60 Minutes' site, and but below is a clip (with transcript) showing DeVos simultaneously being an embarrassing disgrace and a magnificent example of modern conservatism, where who you know is more important than what you know, and being willing to destroy the thing you're ostensibly tasked with nurturing is a key qualification.
Sec. of Education Betsy DeVos struggles to answer fairly basic questions on school performance on 60 Minutes pic.twitter.com/lFVq3USwUW
— Axios (@axios) March 12, 2018
Lesley Stahl: Why take away money from that school that's not working, to bring them up to a level where they are — that school is working?I have an even better idea: Maybe you should quit. Quit your job, quit your reprehensible ideology, quit trying to make life harder for people whose lives are already hard enough, and quit being a fucking asshole and instead use that unfathomable wealth to repair public education and buy yourself some redemption.
Betsy DeVos: Well, we should be funding and investing in students, not in school — school buildings, not in institutions, not in systems. And, so it should be—
Stahl: Okay. But what about the kids who are back at the school that's not working? What about those kids?
DeVos: If— Well, in places where there have been — where there is a lot of choice that's been introduced, um, Florida, for example, the— Studies show that when there's a large number of students that opt to go to a different school or different schools, the traditional public schools, actually, the results get better, as well.
Stahl: Now, has that happened in Michigan? We're in Michigan. This is your home state.
DeVos: Michi— Yes, well, there's lots of great options and choices for students here—
Stahl: Have the public schools in Michigan gotten better?
DeVos: Uh, I don't know. Overall, I— I can't say overall that they have all gotten better.
Stahl: The whole state is not doing well.
DeVos: Well, there are certainly lots of pockets where this — the students are doing well and—
Stahl: No, but your argument that, if you take funds away that the schools will get better, is not working in Michigan, where you had a huge impact and influence over the direction of the school system here.
DeVos: I hesitate to talk about all schools in general, because schools are made up of individual students attending them.
Stahl: The public schools here are doing worse than they did.
DeVos: Michigan schools need to do better. There is no doubt about it.
Stahl: Have you seen the really bad schools? Maybe try to figure out what they're doing?
DeVos: I have not— I have not— I have not intentionally visited schools that are underperforming.
Stahl: Maybe you should.
DeVos: Maybe I should. Yes.
Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus